Comments on Question about securities and multilevel marketing?
December 19, 2008
firstclassmlm @ 11:34 pm
It really sounds very expensive and it is against on what I advise on my 360 page. I would advise you to have a look before you end up frustrated and with less money on your pocket!
Have a look on my 360 and best of luck on all you are planning of doing. If there is anything I can help you with please do not hesitate to contact me
December 22, 2008
Joan B @ 11:27 pm
I agree - they sound way too expensive! And, it sounds complicated. I wouldn't even want to try to analyze the scheme.
I too have my MLM information listed on my 360 degree page - I'd do research on other companies before enlisted in such an expensive program… but I'm no expert!
December 23, 2008
Barry C @ 8:37 am
By the scheme involved, no one is an employee, only an investor. But at the same time, they need to follow company policies, and can not choose the manner of the sales themselves. the law describes that as being an employee, not an independent contractor.
It appears what people are buying is a percentage of the downstream revenue of cosmetics sales. This smells like a security to me
Except for the beauty advisor, no one is required to buy or sell actual tangible products.
This makes it an open question if the business of Kostcot is really selling cosmetics or in fact selling memberships to the next sucker.
Comments on Question about securities and multilevel marketing?
It really sounds very expensive and it is against on what I advise on my 360 page. I would advise you to have a look before you end up frustrated and with less money on your pocket!
Have a look on my 360 and best of luck on all you are planning of doing. If there is anything I can help you with please do not hesitate to contact me
I agree - they sound way too expensive! And, it sounds complicated. I wouldn't even want to try to analyze the scheme.
I too have my MLM information listed on my 360 degree page - I'd do research on other companies before enlisted in such an expensive program… but I'm no expert!
By the scheme involved, no one is an employee, only an investor. But at the same time, they need to follow company policies, and can not choose the manner of the sales themselves. the law describes that as being an employee, not an independent contractor.
It appears what people are buying is a percentage of the downstream revenue of cosmetics sales. This smells like a security to me
Except for the beauty advisor, no one is required to buy or sell actual tangible products.
This makes it an open question if the business of Kostcot is really selling cosmetics or in fact selling memberships to the next sucker.